AXIOM NETWORK GRAPH
Visual map of how the 7 Socratic axioms connect.
THE NETWORK
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ A2: GRACE PRIORITY │
│ (ROOT NODE) │
│ "You must BE before you can DO" │
└──────────┬──────────┬───────────────┘
│ │
┌───────────────────┼──────────┼───────────────────┐
│ │ │ │
▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ A1 │◄─►│ A7 │ │ A4 │ │ A3 │
│ Information │ │ Coherence │ │ Observer │ │ Entropy │
│ Persistence │ │ Conservation │ │ Influence │ │ Opposition │
└──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘
│ │ │ │
│ │ │ │
▼ │ ▼ │
┌──────────────┐ │ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ A5 │◄─────────┼──────────│ (A5 also) │ │
│ Network │ │ │ │ │
│ Amplification│ │ └──────────────┘ │
└──────────────┘ │ │
│ │
▼ ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ A6: RESURRECTION SINGULARITY │
│ (Requires A1, A2, A3, A7) │
│ "Death compresses; resurrection decompresses" │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
EDGE TABLE
| From | To | Relationship | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| A2 | A1 | Grace enables existence; existence enables info persistence | → |
| A2 | A3 | Grace provides energy to oppose entropy | → |
| A2 | A4 | Observers must exist before observing | → |
| A2 | A7 | Coherence requires substrate enabled by grace | → |
| A1 | A3 | Info persists even as entropy scrambles | ↔ |
| A1 | A5 | Networks require stable info transmission | → |
| A1 | A7 | Coherence is structured form of persistent info | ↔ |
| A1 | A6 | Info persistence makes resurrection possible | → |
| A3 | A6 | Resurrection is ultimate entropy reversal | → |
| A4 | A1 | Observation writes info into reality | → |
| A4 | A5 | Multiple observers = amplified effect | → |
| A4 | A7 | Divine observation maintains coherence | → |
| A5 | — | Enables ecclesiology, spiritual warfare (theology) | → |
| A7 | A6 | Coherence conservation means SAME person resurrected | → |
NODE STATISTICS
| Axiom | Upstream | Downstream | Total Edges | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | T0 (ROOT) |
| A1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | T0 |
| A3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | T1 |
| A4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | T0 |
| A5 | 3 | 0* | 3 | T6 |
| A6 | 4 | 0* | 4 | T3 |
| A7 | 2 | 2 | 4 | T0 |
*Downstream extends into theology proper (Papers 1-12)
CRITICAL PATHS
Path to Resurrection (A6)
A2 → A1 → A6
A2 → A3 → A6
A2 → A7 → A6
A2 → A4 → A7 → A6
All paths originate at A2 (Grace Priority). Resurrection requires grace.
Network Effects Path (A5)
A2 → A1 → A5
A2 → A4 → A5
Networks require both information persistence and observer participation.
CONTRADICTION PATHWAYS
If any of these break, the system fails. Stress-test here.
| Path | Test | Failure Mode |
|---|---|---|
| A2 → A1 | Can info exist without prior enablement? | No—info requires substrate; substrate requires existence |
| A1 ↔ A7 | Can info persist without coherence? | Scrambled info persists but identity requires coherence |
| A3 → A6 | Can resurrection occur without entropy reversal? | No—resurrection IS entropy reversal |
| A4 → A7 | Can coherence exist without observation? | Open question—Theophysics says no (divine observation required) |
BIDIRECTIONAL LINKS
Some relationships are genuinely bidirectional (↔):
-
A1 ↔ A7: Information Persistence ↔ Conservation of Coherence
- Info persistence is necessary for coherence
- Coherence is structured form of persistent info
- Neither is strictly prior; they are co-fundamental
-
A1 ↔ A3: Info Persistence ↔ Entropy Opposition
- Entropy scrambles but doesn’t destroy info
- Info persistence proves entropy doesn’t win completely
- Mutual constraint
NAVIGATION
← Back to Axiom Index ← Back to Hub
Canonical Hub: CANONICAL_INDEX