THREE TRUTHS - CKG Quality Scores
Analysis Date: 2026-02-17 Papers Analyzed: 19 (of 22) Average Score: 13.7/100 (5.50/9.0)
📊 Overall Assessment
Series Status: MIXED - Strong core papers, many fragments/notes
Score Distribution:
- ✅ High Quality (60+): 2 papers
- ⚠️ Needs Work (20-59): 3 papers
- 📝 Fragments/Notes (0-19): 14 papers
🏆 Top Performers
-
De Revolutionibus Veritatis: The Cost of Denial → 80/100 (8.0/9.0)
- Excellent epistemic structure
- Strong evidence and integration
-
De Revolutionibus Veritatis: The Lock → 65/100 (7.5/9.0)
- Good foundations and constraints
-
Truth Two: The Measurement Collapse → 50/100 (7.5/9.0)
- Decent structure, needs more evidence
-
The Unavoidable Conclusion (index) → 40/100 (6.5/9.0)
- Basic structure present
-
Truth Three: The Necessary Ground → 20/100 (5.0/9.0)
- Outline/draft stage
⚠️ Papers Needing Development
Score 0/100 (fragments/notes):
- biology.md
- downloads.md
- entropy.md
- finetuning.md
- godel.md
- hubble.md
- inversion.md
- irony.md
- landauer.md
- prayer.md
- propcosmos.md
- triad.md
- truth-one-self-reference-limits.md
Note: These appear to be research notes or concept fragments rather than complete papers.
💡 Recommendations
Focus Development On:
- Complete the “Truth” series (Truth One, Two, Three)
- Expand fragment files into full papers
- Build out evidence sections (Tier 4)
Papers Ready for Publication:
- “The Cost of Denial” (80/100) - strong candidate
- “The Lock” (65/100) - needs minor revision
📁 Full Data
Location: MAIN_PAPERS/OpenAI_DATA/
CSV Export: CKG_Comparison_20260217_141803.csv
For detailed scores by tier, see individual JSON files in OpenAI_DATA folder.
Next Steps:
- Review top papers for publication readiness
- Develop fragment files into complete papers
- Add evidence sections to mid-range papers
Canonical Hub: CANONICAL_INDEX